Retrieval, reranking, and grounded generation designed for the real corpus you have — not a demo dataset. Evaluation harnesses and citations make quality a number you can move.
Retrieval quality is the whole game. We design every stage — ingestion, chunking, embeddings, retrieval, reranking, and grounding — around measurable answer quality.
Batch and streaming ingestion from wikis, ticketing systems, PDFs, and databases, with change-data-capture where it matters.
Semantic chunking, structural preservation, and metadata enrichment tuned to your document types.
Model selection, dimensionality choices, and per-domain fine-tuning that keep retrieval fast and precise.
Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector, or Elasticsearch chosen for your scale, latency budget, and hosting constraints.
Dense plus BM25 retrieval and cross-encoder rerankers that lift answer quality on hard queries.
Prompt patterns, citation formats, and low-confidence handling that keep answers tied to retrieved sources.
Four phases that put retrieval evaluation on the critical path from week one.
We inventory sources, structure, freshness, and permissions, and define the questions the system must answer.
We pick chunking, embedding, and index strategies, and stand up a working retrieval baseline against real data.
A golden set of questions drives iteration on rerankers, prompts, and grounding rules until quality holds.
We ship behind feature flags, wire tracing and cost dashboards, and set up alerts for drift and regression.
Retrieval libraries, vector databases, embedding models, and the orchestration and eval tools that keep RAG honest.
Workflows where the right answer lives in your documents and users need it faster than manual search allows.
Cross-source retrieval over wikis, playbooks, and design docs with per-user permission enforcement.
Question-answering over long contracts, policies, and regulatory filings with citations back to clauses.
Agent assist and self-service answers grounded in your help center, past tickets, and product docs.
Battlecards, competitive intel, and pricing answers delivered fast during live calls.
Grounded Q&A over policy libraries, standards, and internal guidance with an audit trail.
A single query surface spanning wikis, CRM, ticketing, and file stores with permission-aware retrieval.
A well-built RAG pipeline compounds — better retrieval, better answers, more adoption, more feedback.
Responses cite the documents that produced them, so users can trust and verify what the system says.
Retrieval-first design and low-confidence escalation cut fabricated answers to a measurable level.
Every answer carries source references, so compliance and QA can reconstruct any response.
Model routing, caching, and reranking budgets make cost per query a knob you can turn.
A grounded support copilot built end-to-end with a real retrieval and evaluation stack.
AI • RAG
A retrieval-augmented support copilot that grounds answers in a company's own knowledge base.
Read Case Study →A senior team that has debugged retrieval quality in production and knows the difference between a demo and a system.
Learn more about us →Chunking, embeddings, hybrid search, and reranking are core skills, not afterthoughts on top of a chatbot.
A golden question set is defined before we write the first ingestion job, and it drives every design decision.
We tell you what a RAG system can and cannot answer given your corpus, and where a different approach fits better.
Ingestion, retrieval, generation, monitoring, and cost — one team accountable across the whole pipeline.
Practical answers on retrieval, evaluation, and how RAG systems actually reach production.
Book a working session and we'll map your corpus, questions, and success criteria into a concrete build plan.
Book a Discovery Session →